Governance process
Outline
This page describes the process that should be followed to take an idea to implementation through the Gyroscope governance system.
Step 1: Consultation, discussion and revision
Step 2: Indicative vote on Snapshot
Step 3: Final on-chain vote
Step 1 - Consultation
Anyone can think of an idea and write it up as a post in the Gyroscope Improvement Proposals section of the Gyroscope Forum.
Guidelines
The title should be in the format “[Consultation] - Topic”
The body should contain the following sections:
Background/motivation
Summary of proposal: A clear and easy to understand description of the proposed change, and how the change would affect the protocol
Risk assessment: an explanation of the risks to the protocol involved in the proposed change
Timeline
The Consultation phase should last for a minimum of 72 hours before moving to an indicative vote on Snapshot.
Any Gyroscope Governance participant with more than 10 GGU can extend the minimum consultation time period to 7 days. This is to allow more consultation time for potentially complex topics if needed.
If the Consultation goes stale or the creator of the proposal does not create a Snapshot proposal, after 4 weeks elapses the post will be closed.
Step 2 - Indicative vote on Snapshot
Requirements
Following Step 1, To be able create a Snapshot Proposal in the Gyroscope Governance space, the creator needs to have at least 3 GGU.
Guidelines
The title should be in the format “[Indicative Vote] - Topic”
The body should contain the following sections:
Background/motivation
Summary of proposal: A clear and easy to understand description of the proposed change, and how the change would affect the protocol
Feedback from Step 1, which much include an explanation of how this was incorporated into the proposal.
Risk assessment: an explanation of the risks to the protocol involved in the proposed change
A link to the original Consultation in Step 1. Once created on Snapshot, a link to the Snapshot proposal should also be posted in the original Consultation proposal.
Timeline
Voting runs for 96 hours starting on Thursdays.
Quorum is set to 100 GGU.
If the outcome of the vote is yes and quorum is met move to Step 3 - Final on-chain vote.
Step 3 - Final on-chain vote
Requirements
To move to Step 3, the proposal should have met quorum and received a 'yes' vote on Step 2.
Guidelines
A new post should be created on the Gyroscope Governance forum.
The title should be in the format “[GIP-1] - Topic”
The body should contain the following sections:
Background/motivation
Summary of proposal: A clear and easy to understand description of the proposed change, and how the change would affect the protocol.
Risk assessment: an explanation of the risks to the protocol involved in the proposed change
Links:
A link to a PR, opened in the relevant Gyroscope repository, that would implement the change(s) as described in the proposal.
A link to the Proposal, as implemented by the PR, on the Gyroscope Governance dashboard. Sufficient governance power in terms of GGU is needed to be able to create a proposal.
A link to the original Consultation from Step 1.
A link to the Indicative vote from Step 2.
Timeline
Voting will then take place for a timeframe and with a quorum determined by the pre-set parameters.
Once created, any participant is able to for "for", "against", or "abstain" on-chain. Votes can be changed at anytime. The vote tally can be triggered by anyone. If quorum and the vote threshold is reached, the proposal is queued for execution.
For more details on the on-chain voting process, please see here.
Last updated